Simplepig if you’re seeing this know you have fans.

1. The critics there were complete dogshit, or at least one of them was. I uploaded a draft with tons of SPaG on it, the critic reviewing mine greenlit it and I got screwed over. And no, he knew there was SPaG in the article and just decided not to tell me. So fuck that.
2. Although I tried to ignore this. There was like 3 pedophiles sexually harassing somebody on their discord that their moderation team did nothing about. That was a clear red flag.
3. Other than the pedophiles, the large majority of people there just gave me a bad vibe. I do find it funny however that people insult this wiki and RPC when the actual Backrooms Wikidot feels like its being run by Jared Fogle.

And with those reasons why I joined Liminal Archive. I hope I can get along with all of you.

What about it didn't people like? Do I need more crit? I want to try again! I want to create scary Backrooms levels! Liminal Archives is the best Backrooms site. Better than the others.

On Level 1 I made no major changes to the meaning of the content, while on smilers I did go out on a limb and add some bolder edits. I'm all about quality through collaboration, so don't hold back on critique for anything I do, and let me know if edits like this are extensive enough that I should be posting drafts instead of editing live. I don't think I've broken any rules or gone contrary to any other advice I've seen in the "Information" section of the site, but I'd like someone to tell me if I'm stepping on toes or breaking decorum.

My plans here begin with general edits for diction and sentence structure for the overall stylistic consistency of levels 2-27. Beyond that, I'm also interested in leading the charge on a consistency pass to shore up logical contradictions (see my other thread for details.)
Way down the road I may consider adding a floor or two, but that's dependent on inspiration, and on finishing my edits to make sure I know what I'm doing as far as style and canon go.

I look forward to working with you all!

Stay sane,
K. W.

I'm on my third or fourth reading of the Level articles and I can't tell whether or not the inconsistencies are intentional. There are a good few contradictions, but one that immediately comes to mind is Level 1's Communities and Entrances and Exits sections. The average reader will likely have questions about the means of operating outposts in L1.

Besides the article's advisement against settling in L1, the entrances and exits section states that there's no way into L1 except other universes. In addition to contradicting later levels (such as the Cavity) which claim to have methods of returning to L1, this also implies that a settlement would be dependent on gathering the extremely scant supplies from L1 or subsisting on what new people have on from baseline. Neither seems feasible, and I wonder if the original idea was that readers are intended to notice this and speculate how outposts stock supplies.

It seems more likely to me that people simply didn't get around to adding to Entrances and Exits after a new level is written and approved. If that's the case I'd like to eliminate inconsistencies in the existing articles at least as far as entrances and exits go, but I want to make sure there's not a reason this hasn't been done yet before I do.

While I'm at it I'd also like to run a more general consistency pass as well, shoring up less obvious contradictions and perhaps adding more inter-level material for a more cohesive read. It appears that the current floors are all liked enough to assume that they will remain — in some form or another — canon for the foreseeable future. Nevertheless, I don't quite have a handle on the voice the articles are supposed to be written from. I haven't found anything about it in the writing guide, so it feels like these are probably public UNCB documents intended to disseminate general knowledge and survival tips. If this is so, the inconsistencies seem unlikely to be an intentional feature, although I see huge potential to hint at anomalies that create inter-level discrepancies in mind or in reality.

So if you've got a stake in the level articles and/or the canon, please chime in! I look forward to hearing others' thoughts on this and working together to create a cogent canon that reads smoothly and unnerves with the best of 'em.

G'nite,
K.W.

^{Hope you're having a great day~}

Our next planned contest will be a COLLABORATIVE EFFORT!
We will be pairing authors up into groups of 2 at random for the funzies and shenanigans.

Further details coming soon, including exact starting and ending dates, prizes, etc. For now, if you're interested, simply leave a comment in this forum thread to get your name into the contest pool. We'd like to see how many people are interested before getting too concrete with the details.

When the contest begins, everyone who signed up here will be paired up at random.

I will be joining the name pool if we get an odd number of members signed up to be randomly selected - that way no one is left out <3

Sweet! That's all I have for you guys for now. Until then stay safe and happy writing!

^{- Knaff}

Thank you for taking the time to read this and I hope you put this into consideration. Have a nice day :D